Tim Waugh (tim@cyberelk.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:33:20 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Roger Schreiter wrote:
> I suggest to introduce the non-blocking-feature also for the
> negotiation funcs. (Same way as proposed in Tims draft
> for write and read funcs.)
Yes.
> And what about 35msec? (This long wuold parport_wait_peripheral
> [...]
> I think it's also too long.
Yes.
> That's why I would like to introduce another flag which tells
> parport_wait_peripheral to give up earlier (to be called once
> again later for the same state).
Okay.
> What do you think about finding a way, telling parport_wait_peripheral
> to abort ealier, as I explained above?
It's a good idea.
Tim.
*/
-- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
-- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri 24 Sep 1999 - 14:25:30 EDT