Re: [PARPORT] Questions with ppdev

From: Philip Blundell (pb@futuretv.com)
Date: Thu Mar 15 2001 - 11:23:12 EST

  • Next message: Michael Reinelt: "Re: [PARPORT] Questions with ppdev"

    In message <20010315094634.N19968@redhat.com>, Tim Waugh writes:
    >On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 08:45:35AM +0100, Michael Reinelt wrote:
    >> Maybe ppdev should provide an interface to the kernel udelay()
    >> function?
    >
    >Not sure. I'd rather not. Anyone else know the answer to the timing
    >issue?

    I don't remember what the original problem was, but I agree that ppdev
    probably should not have a udelay function. Does nanosleep not do what's
    needed?

    p.

    -- To unsubscribe, send mail to: linux-parport-request@torque.net --
    -- with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body of the message. --

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 19:24:00 EST